De Ilse Van Roy
Countries from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe have adopted volunteer community health worker (CHW) programs to act as the bridge between the community and health professionals and make life saving interventions available to underserved areas (CHW Central, 2021). Many programs were initiated following the 1978 Declaration of Alma Ata. The impact and effectiveness of these programs is however inconsistent at best. A wide body of literature documents failures with programs that saw CHWs as a solution to deliver primary health care (PHC) at low cost. Many of these programs were inadequately funded and CHWs were often not adequately trained, supervised and supported nor fully recognized and integrated in the health system. This led to low motivation and high attrition of the volunteers. However, certain countries developed strong, comprehensive programs providing clear evidence of the effectiveness of CHWs in delivering priority interventions, adapted to the local context. In Africa, the Ethiopian and Rwandan programs are widely recognized as leading examples of effective community health services. Today, there is recognition in the global health community that CHW programs can be a cost-effective way to bring health services to the hardest to reach communities (Masis et al., 2021).
CHW programs are listed as one of the most valuable tools to reach health goals and make progress towards achieving universal health coverage by 2030 (Perry et al., 2021). A high-level panel, consisting of the United Nations Secretary Special Envoy for Financing the Health MDGs, several African state prime ministers, UNICEF, WHO, World Bank and community stakeholders concluded that there is a strong case for investment in community health workers as a component of primary health care (Strengthening PHC, 2015). Such programs not only have direct health benefits, but have a potential economic return on investment of up to 10:1 as the result of increased productivity of a healthier population, reduced impact of pandemics and increased employment.
The panel also called upon government leaders to seek innovative financing arrangements to scale up CHW programs across the continent and the international community to fund the start-up costs of these programs. However, financing of large scale, nation-wide comprehensive CHW programs remains a major challenge. The 2018 WHO guidelines for CHW programmes (WHO, 2018) emphasise that CHW programmes require long-term and dedicated financing. Attempts to set up and run a large-scale CHW initiative on a shoestring budget are likely to yield disappointing outcomes. The USAID’s Centre for Accelerating Innovation and Impact and the Financing Alliance for Health estimates a funding gap of $2 Billion to build and strengthen community health systems in sub-Saharan Africa (USAID, 2021).
The impact and effectiveness of these programs is however inconsistent at best. A wide body of literature documents failures with programs that saw CHWs as a solution to deliver primary health care (PHC) at low cost.
Such programs not only have direct health benefits, but have a potential economic return on investment of up to 10:1 as the result of increased productivity of a healthier population, reduced impact of pandemics and increased employment.
The WHO guideline recommends that practicing CHWs receive a financial package that reflects the job demands and its complexity, the number of hours, training and the roles that they are asked to undertake. It is estimated that only 15% of CHWs deployed in sub-Saharan Africa programmes receive a regular remuneration or salary while the majority works as volunteers (Masis et al., 2021). CHWs often live and work in rural locations, in communities living close to the poverty line. Expecting CHWs to deliver lifesaving work without entitlement to decent pay is inconsistent with the international agenda on decent work (ILO, Decent Work). Not surprisingly, reviews of programs have found that CHW motivation and performance (or lack of) was closely linked to the degree of satisfaction of the CHWs with the incentives received (Colvin et al., 2021).
To ensure that CHWs feel as valued and respected members of the health system with a clear role and defined responsibilities is an important non-monetary motivator. However, financial recognition is at least as important and there is emerging consensus that CHWs should be adequately paid (Ballard et al., 2021). But lack of political will and especially limited financing remain major hurdles in many low-income countries. While these are unlikely to be adequately addressed in the short term, the development community should in the meantime seek innovative solutions to improve the economic independence of CHWs.
It is estimated that only 15% of CHWs deployed in sub-Saharan Africa programmes receive a regular remuneration or salary while the majority works as volunteers.
The government of the small ‘Kingdom in the Sky’ in Southern Africa strengthened the community involvement in primary health care in 1979 through the introduction of the village health worker (VHW) program. With one of the highest rates of HIV infections in the world (23%) and a significant shortage in health human resources, the VHW program played a major role in the scale-up of HIV treatment and care (Rigodon et al., 2012). Today they continue to deliver essential HIV and tuberculosis care to their communities as well as services in maternal and child health care. Originally deployed as volunteers, the government introduced an incentive scheme for the VHWs. A monthly stipend of 300 Maloti ($19) is promised but, the payment often fails to materialize. VHWs report delays of up to four years of backlog in payment of their stipends (Lesotho Times, 2018).
But lack of political will and especially limited financing remain major hurdles in many low-income countries. While these are unlikely to be adequately addressed in the short term, the development community should in the meantime seek innovative solutions to improve the economic independence of CHWs.
Community based chronic care Lesotho (ComBaCaL), a large-scale 5-year project by SolidarMed and various local stakeholders including the Ministry of Health seeks to replicate the success from HIV care in non-communicable disease (NCD) care. The project opted for an alternative novel way to sustainably finance the CHWs. In addition to being entitled to the government stipend, the CHWs recruited in the project are being empowered to become micro-entrepreneurs in their spare time. Initial market research has indicated that many CHWs already have some ‘entrepreneurial ideas’ that can be harnessed and with appropriate support developed into income generating activities.
The project opted for an alternative novel way to sustainably finance the CHWs. In addition to being entitled to the government stipend, the CHWs recruited in the project are being empowered to become micro-entrepreneurs in their spare time.
A pilot is now underway whereby CHWs are introduced to the "Start and Improve Your Business" training (SIYB), developed by the International Labour Organisation. The programme has a strong track record of promoting development of micro enterprises. In the past 40 years, 23.7 million people have received the training and by the end of 2020, it is estimated that the implementation of SIYB had led to the start-up of at least 5.4 million new businesses, creating more than 10.4 million jobs globally (ILO, 2021).
The CHWs in the ComBaCaL project will have access to micro-financing to implement their business idea as well as ongoing supervision and mentoring with the goal to become self-reliant. However, it remains to be seen how they can keep an adequate balance between their role in NCD care and their business. This pilot initiative will provide guidance on how a CHW program can be financially sustainable – independent of long-term donor funding.